Quality Control - Frontal Cortex
QUALITY CHECK OF FRONTAL CORTEX SAMPLES (#25 - #48)
Please see explanation page for more information on quality values:
- SF = Scaling Factor (less than 10 desired)
- BG Avg = Background average (less than 100 desired)
- % present = Percent probes present (consistent values desired)
- GAPDH/M33197 = 3'/5' ratio (less than 3 desired)
#25 - #48 FRONTAL CORTEX |
Date |
SF |
BG Avg |
% Present |
HS-AFFX- HUMGAPDH/ M33197-SIG35 |
FC-A1-25 |
02/14/07 - 12:25 PM |
2.619 |
72.48 |
45.44 |
1.04 |
FC-A2-26 |
02/14/07 - 12:13 PM |
3.741 |
76.77 |
39.15 |
1.26 |
FC-A3-27 |
02/14/07 - 11:17 AM |
2.21 |
68.94 |
45.45 |
0.99 |
FC-A4-28 |
02/14/07 - 11:28 AM |
2.605 |
79.2 |
43.36 |
1.11 |
FC-A5-29 |
02/14/07 - 11:51 AM |
2.679 |
150.27 |
33.44 |
1.35 |
FC-A6-30 |
02/14/07 - 11:40 AM |
2.626 |
65.11 |
44.35 |
1.24 |
FC-B1-31 |
02/14/07 - 12:36 PM |
2.676 |
69.64 |
43 |
0.96 |
FC-B2-32 |
02/14/07 - 12:02 PM |
2.846 |
65.43 |
44.18 |
1 |
FC-B3-33 |
02/14/07 - 03:03 PM |
2.164 |
99.13 |
45.38 |
1.11 |
FC-B4-34 |
02/14/07 - 02:52 PM |
2.323 |
66.14 |
50.17 |
1.16 |
FC-B5-35 †¶ |
02/14/07 - 02:41 PM |
9.385 |
65.7 |
25.03 |
2.41 |
FC-B6-36 †¶ |
02/14/07 - 02:30 PM |
10.593 |
72.84 |
23.45 |
2.55 |
FC-C1-37 |
02/14/07 - 02:19 PM |
2.045 |
77.58 |
46.18 |
0.98 |
FC-C2-38 |
02/14/07 - 02:07 PM |
3.495 |
80.25 |
36.39 |
1.27 |
FC-C3-39 |
02/14/07 - 01:56 PM |
1.638 |
116.08 |
43.99 |
1.09 |
FC-C4-40 |
02/14/07 - 01:45 PM |
1.327 |
91.07 |
48.66 |
0.94 |
FC-C5-41 |
02/16/07 - 11:29 AM |
2.676 |
68.23 |
44.92 |
1.39 |
FC-C6-42 |
02/16/07 - 11:40 AM |
3.792 |
84.98 |
37.19 |
2.58 |
FC-C7-43 |
03/06/07 - 12:41 PM |
2.125 |
82.82 |
44.6 |
1.2 |
FC-D1-44 |
03/06/07 - 12:30 PM |
2.782 |
63.48 |
45.94 |
1.24 |
FC-D2-45 |
03/06/07 - 12:19 PM |
4.578 |
70.27 |
35.79 |
1.81 |
FC-D3-46 |
03/06/07 - 12:07 PM |
6.389 |
66.97 |
33.91 |
2.62 |
FC-D4-47 |
03/06/07 - 11:23 AM |
2.266 |
80.92 |
46.56 |
1.13 |
FC-D5-48 |
03/06/07 - 11:34 AM |
5.329 |
72.38 |
35.49 |
1.7 |
Potential anomalous values are bolded
** Designates that the RNA gels show evidence of degradation
¶ Designates that the sample has multiple anomalies that, in aggregate, suggest that RNA degradation could have had an influence on the hybridization results on this particular chip. This influence would not necessarily affect all of the probe sets.